—by David Falk—
I didn’t mention at that time that women’s leagues should also be a talking point. The debut of WPSL clubs in Issaquah and Seattle this summer suggests this.
I love to dream and create, and even though my ideas are usually a bit rough around the edges, hopefully there are nuggets in there somewhere. So I have been thinking specifically lately about two areas I’d love to see get higher level soccer clubs: Tacoma and Port Angeles.
These are clearly two very different markets, yet there is at least some reason to think that they’d be good places for the right owners with the right passion and cash to start clubs.
Tacoma has been on the edges of the Seattle soccer scene for years. The Tide of the PDL ran from 2006-2011 before being bought and renamed “Sounders U-23.” They played this year at Franklin Pierce High School and a few other locations.
If I were starting a club purely for the love of soccer and the city of Tacoma, I’d make sure it had Tacoma’s name in it, and also associated itself in some way with the area…in a way that is distinct from Seattle.
So, how about Tacoma Narrows FC? (Or, The Tacoma Narrows, or properly Tacoma Narrows Football Club.) See a general design elements idea below that uses navy, gold and the Narrows bridge in a logo.
There are all kinds of obstacles for making this work, but no guts, no glory, right? Tacoma would need its own venue as the school district is not user-friendly when it comes to renting stadiums. The goal would be to enter a regional league such as the Pacific Coast Soccer League, and eventually develop funding and investors to make Tacoma an NASL (North American Soccer League) city.
Why Tacoma is a good idea:
Why Tacoma is a risk:
Up north on the Olympic Peninsula is the town of Port Angeles. It is a boat ride away from a bunch of clubs up north in the Pacific Coast Soccer League. The town is home to the Peninsula Community College Pirates, who are annual NWAACC contenders in both men’s and women’s soccer.
Port Angeles would be a unique place to start a soccer club for several reasons, and these reasons cut both ways. The small population (23,ooo in the city) could either mean a chance to really be something special in the community…or not enough customers to draw from.
The isolated location is the same way: you could look at it as a captive audience with no other live local summer sports to attend, or as an undeveloped market that is a bit of a question mark.
That won’t stop me from dreaming about the Port Angeles Peaks. See a general design idea below that uses “PA” and mountain imagery with cool turquoise and silver.
Why Port Angeles is a good idea:
Why Port Angeles is a risk:
Your input and daydreams are wanted! What do you think of these names / places / ideas? Got your own to share? Post in the comments section below!
Do you have money to invest? Want to talk privately? I can be reached at goalWA@gmail.com.
I don’t agree with the statement that Tacoma fans expect professional amenities. The real problem is the Tacoma public school district does not, has not, and will not support soccer. Want proof? Look at the ridiculous fees they charge for even the youth level to play at the high school fields. The outprice the fields to the very kids that eventually will be attending their schools. Is there a better venue than Stadium H.S.? The answer is no, and the TPSD shows it support to the Sounders and the youth by making fees unreasonable. Now, if this was a youth (american) football or comeback sports issue, they would gladly assist.
Maybe a statement closer to what I actually meant is that Tacoma fans expect their minor league franchises to be run professionally. Is that accurate?
Whoops, my apologies. great article anyways!
No problem. I needed to be clearer on that one!
What ever happened to Capital City Soccer Club??? Tacoma Soccer and every where else is being pampered right now with sponsors and this and that…no love for the Capital of Washington or what? All that’s here is youth clubs galore…I don’t know, just frustrated with the men’s scene out here. TCPFC is a joke fyi….
Great logo and colors, but the guy trying to get it off the ground didn’t find financial help.
Port Angeles also has Sequim nearby, a sponsorship with Black Ball would help get them to Victoria. Penninsula College draws fairly well.
All of Jefferson County would be in the market area.
Well lets see of the best local teams:
Kitsap Pumas
Washington Crossfire
Northsound seawolves
Sounders U23′s
Don’t see any “City’s” represented
Let’s be happy that PIERCE COUNTY represents one of the best PDL clubs in the NATION and are playing in the semi-finals this weekend, not to mention a open cup berth this year. Yes, they are named Sounders but plan B was to not have a PDL team at all. This years attendence was up maybe 4 times last year ? Besides the love of the game you also needs piles of $money$. TacomaFC which owns both the Sounders u23s and The Women’s Sounders have done pretty good this year.
Let’s give more support for what we have, rather than worry about what we don’t. Folks from Tacoma have invested more $$ this year than maybe the last ten years combined. Also remember , South Sound FC (Tacoma ownership) that represents the USA in the All Nations Cup and sent a U20 team to the USASA National championship in Chicago. They also won the Starfire celebration cup against the “other” SSFC team sponsored by Doyles. Tacoma vs Tacoma in the championship
Any givin Tuesday you can see all these guys battled it out on several indoor teams at the Tacoma Soccer Center. http://www.southsoundfc.com
So my view is Soccer is very much on the rise in Tacoma even though the name “Tacoma” may not appear on any kits
Kitsap gets a pass, but all of the others also need name changes. Stick up for your home towns, people. “Washington” Crossfire? Weak. “North Sound.” Vague. “Sounders U-23.” No community inherent in it, other than curious Sounders fans. “South Sound FC.” OK. They can do whatever they’d like to. However, it’s not taking Tacoma’s name. Think of this as a marriage. I guess no one wants to “marry” Tacoma when it comes to soccer relationships. Personally I love the name of that city as well as how it could look next to an FC.
Time to fix some kits then, wouldn’t you say…so people around the country and the city KNOW it’s on the rise???? Tacoma Stars have it right.
Slightly off topic (not about PA or Tacoma specifically), but I think we might be thinking in the wrong direction in terms of growing adult competitive full field soccer.
We already have a health league of fairly well organized indoor teams (Kitsap, “South Sound,” Marysville, etc..) We also have a healthy NW Division in a summer league, the PDL. But, half of the teams are connected to a youth system or a higher level professional system.
We also seem to be one of the few regions in the country where we only have PDL summer teams and not an NPSL system along side it.
Hows this for a formula? Start with poaching a couple of teams from the PDL and possibly also the Bellingham team that plays in Canada. Then add in a few teams with organizational structure from the PASL-Premier and have them expand into a summer outdoors league.
And, since the NPSL isn’t ruled by the PDL’s geographic rules, you could put another team in King County. Actually, I’m not sure the NPSL has any geographic rules, so why not two? One at Starfire, the other at Interbay.
For example, the league would look like this:
Kitsap Pumas
South Sound (Tacoma) FC
Bellingham United
Wenatchee Fire
Starfire Team
Interbay Team
I’d LOVE a state league that also included Eastern WA. Remember this from the 80′s? http://goalwa.wordpress.com/2011/10/09/olympia-fc-was-part-of-1980s-western-washington-city-league/